Template:Did you know nominations/Alexei Vinogradov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 15:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Alexei Vinogradov[edit]

Created by Pudeo (talk). Self-nominated at 20:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Comment verifying the hook is going to be problematic since it comes from an offline printed book, written in Finnish. Brianhe (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Usually good-faith is used on foreign sources. The book in question is written by the Finnish historian Ari Raunio and the Russian historian Yuri Kilin (hence they could use archive sources from both countries). However, there seem to be English-language sources from Google Books with the search term Vinogradov+Suomussalmi: like this [1]. I'll add that as an additional source. Pudeo' 13:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

OK I'm starting the review now.

  • new enough nominated Aug 3, same day as creation
  • long enough over 3k characters
  • policy Neutral and each para has at least one citation. Offline sources accepted AGF as discussed above.
  • hook Just squeaks by at 197 characters, however is in passive voice with the DYK article at the very end. Encourage nom to consider rewriting as pithier. New ALT1 accepted by nom.
  • other QPQ appears to be pending. QPQ rules stipulate "completed QPQ review". @Pudeo: Please indicate at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Isenhour if you accept the new hook, and I think it's done. QPQ of Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Isenhour completed.

Reviewer -- Brianhe (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

  • I finished the QPQ at Mary Isenhour now. I'm fine with either hook, the ALT1 as well, although I've heard some people complain that the unliteral usage of decimate, loss of 1/10, is incorrect. But I'm not sure if that's the case as the popular usage is indeed to describe heavy casualties. Pudeo' 23:20, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
OK, review completed; this looks good to go (I happen to like "decimated" but understand this can be further changed during review)! Brianhe (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)