The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: I'm AGFing on many of the offline sources, since I can't get access to most of them. However, I can get access to the hook source through JSTOR, and I can confirm that it does verify the hook. This is long enough, and I think it's more substantial than a stub (i.e. an article deemed too short and incomplete to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject), even if it is written as one section with a references list. Looks good to me. — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 05:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm AGFing on many of the offline sources, since I can't get access to most of them. However, I can get access to the hook source through JSTOR, and I can confirm that it does verify the hook. This is long enough, and I think it's more substantial than a stub (i.e.