Template:Did you know nominations/A Promised Land

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

A Promised Land

Presidential portrait of Obama in 2012
Presidential portrait of Obama in 2012
  • ... that even though A Promised Land by Barack Obama (pictured) was to be released in mid-November, The New York Times reported in September that the book was "virtually guaranteed" to be the year's top seller? Source: "On Thursday, Penguin Random House announced that it would release Mr. Obama’s memoir in November, with an initial run of three million copies. It is virtually guaranteed to be the biggest book of the year." (New York Times)
    • ALT1:... that the 2020 book A Promised Land by Barack Obama (pictured) took longer to write than any other presidential memoir in the past hundred years? Source: "Obama took three years and 10 months to publish — longer than any other American president in the last century." (New York Times)
    • ALT2:... that the audiobook version of the 2020 presidential memoir A Promised Land is over 28 hours long and narrated by Barack Obama (pictured)? Source: "This unabridged audiobook clocks in at an impressive 28 hours and 10 minutes... it joins Jimmy Carter’s White House Diary and George W. Bush’s Decision Points as a presidential memoir read by its author." Rolling Stone

5x expanded by Footlessmouse (talk). Self-nominated at 12:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC).

  • This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the hooks could be used. The image is in the public domain, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues, as I think the one Earwig highlighted as 96.8% suspicious was copied from Wikipedia. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! Earwig's was a trip, I didn't check it beforehand (disclaimer: I never do, I don't copy and paste except in quotes so I should never have problems). If you click on that link it takes you to a forum that doesn't currently contain any of that info, so I'm not sure what the deal is, I would guess it was copied from an earlier version of the article. Some of the phrases are common enough to be coincidence, like how Stokols published reviews in two papers, I remember writing that but it was just the easiest way to state it. The vast majority of the flagged content predates my work on the article, though. Footlessmouse (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)