This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Fram, regarding [this edit], can you be specific? The applicable clause is "Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." The link is from my blog, and I have been quoted here and here and contributed an article here on the topic. Independent Newspapers is South Africa's largest media company, so would suggest it fits the bill as reliable third party. The article on my personal blog provides the best summary of the situation, to my mind. I suggest that someone coming to an encyclopedia and wanting to find out more about the topic would benefit more from having it there than not, which is the ultimate principle. However, since there's a conflict of interest, I'll leave it other editors to decide and to restore if they wish. Greenman (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
100 < articles < 1000 is tiny, this article isn't notable, less all the other wikis out there with the same amount of pages become notable! See the navbox of wikis for more info. @Yamla: do your thing. 94.193.111.99 (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
