Talk:Wyntoon/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk · contribs · count) 21:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
There is good prose throughout.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
The article has a good layout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
The article is well referenced.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Sources used are reliable.

C. No original research:
There does not appear to be any original research.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The article retains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are all freely licensed in the public domain with the exception of one fair use image with the correct licence.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Captions are succinct and informative.
Overall: A very interesting read. Harrison49 (talk) 21:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pass or Fail: