Talk:World Intellectual Property Organization/Archives/2017

Entirely POV

The article reads like promotional material and contains zero criticism for a world body that organizes countries over a controversial issue -- especially even in a space like Wikipedia's, a project which largely depends on fair use and public domain, aspects of copyright which WIPO et al erode continually over time. Particularly of damnability is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which (as the DMCA article itself notes) was passed in order to satisfy rules imposed through WIPO treaties. The lack of any and all critique on this page is striking, not only from a self-interest perspective, but also from an encyclopedic comprehensiveness perspective. - 64.187.160.52 (talk) 04:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Seconded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.222.159.160 (talk) 05:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)