Talk:William T. Anderson

Needs references

This article has no sources, unref tag added. --FloNight 23:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

One of the listed sources is T. J. Stiles which is just a red-link. This could be either "Jesse James: Last Rebel of the Civil War" ISBN 978-0375405839 or "Civil War Commanders" ISBN 0399519092. Is anyone in a position to verify and add the correct source? Franamax 23:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Certainly, this sentence, "It is also inaccurate in that he was not a zombie, though it is believed he hated debate teams." is a joke. I laughed out loud when I read it. As this is not one of the pages I work on, I'll leave it to one of you to change. HornColumbia (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Is William T. Anderson the prototype of Black John Ambrose in Daniel Woodrell's novel "Woe to Live On"? K.K., Estonia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.233.71.57 (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Source and references

Find a Grave is not acceptable as a source or reference. It fails;

• 1)-WP:SOURCES; Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
• 2)- WP:NOTRELIABLE; Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight.
• 3)- WP:SELFPUBLISH; Find a Grave is user edited and uses anonymous or pseudonymous editors.
• 4)- WP:SPS; This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database, Cracked.com, CBDB.com, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users. Find a Grave is not currently specifically named as is IMBd but falls under "and so forth". Rational dictates that Find a Grave, while not listed by name in WP:SPS, certainly falls under the criteria.
• For rationale and consensus (aside from the policies and guidelines listed) please read WP:Find-A-Grave famous people#When creating articles which states, Remember that all articles must satisfy Wikipedia core policies of notability (WP:NOTABILITY), verifiability (WP:VERIFIABILITY) and reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE SOURCES). Find-A-Grave is not considered a reliable source., and further, For any articles you create because of this project, you can add the entry's Find-A-Grave link to the External links sections of the article.. While this deals with articles being created it also certainly applies to any articles already created. Otr500 (talk) 07:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:William T. Anderson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 02:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

• Well, Malleus called me a glutton for punishment, so let's prove it. Time to turn on the country music. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
  • lol, listening to country music is enough punishment in my book. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.	Good
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Good
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Per definition
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	See below
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	See below
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

Comments

• As you are bound to bring this to FAC, I'll be very thorough.
• Ensure that the capitalisation of Northern and Southern is in accordance with the MOS.
  • I think I took care of them.

1

1a

Lede

• "He distinguished himself by the leading role he took in the Lawrence Massacre and later participated in the Battle of Fort Blair." -- Why not "He distinguished himself by taking a leading role in the Lawrence Massacre, then later participated in the Battle of Fort Blair."
• "... while the two spent the winter in Texas,..." -- Which two? You mention both Quantrill and Todd in the above paragraph
  • Did both.

Early life

• "... to William C. Anderson and Martha Anderson." -- Why not "... to William C. and Martha Anderson."?
• "Although the Anderson family did not own slaves, they supported the institution of slavery." -- Is "... of slavery" necessary?
• "After settling in Council Grove..." -- Thought they settled east of it
  • Fixed both.

Horse trading

• "He became incensed by the accusations and was particularly angered that Baker issued the arrest warrant." -- Which Anderson became incensed?
  • Think I clarified.
• "historian Bruce Nichols argues that Reed led the gang until mid-July" -- any other positions?
  • I don't understand what you're asking here?
    • Do any historians have a different opinion of the matter?

Quantrill's Raiders

• "... enabling vicious guerrilla warfare in the state." -- I'm sure "vicious guerrilla warfare" could have occurred without Confederate sympathies. Another word?
  • How's "prompting"?
• "... where he served under George M. Todd." - Why under Todd and not Quantrill?
  • Quantrill led the whole group, he had unit leaders under him, Anderson was in a unit led by Todd--tried to clarify.
• "... network of support ..." -- Support network?
  • Yes, that is much better, wonder why I didn't say that.

Lawrence Massacre

• "... the largest guerrilla force under one commander in the war, ..." - Not quite pleased with the wording, thinking something like "... which proved to be the largest guerrilla force under one commander in the war, ..."
• "Provost Marshall of Kansas" - Huh? Clarification, maybe a footnote. Or even better, a link
• "Although some men begged him to spare them, he was not dissuaded, although he did respond to the pleas of a woman who asked him not to burn her house." -- "Although ... although"
  • Good catches, done all three.

Return to Missouri

• "... gaining about $40,000 in the robbery, although Anderson returned some money to his friend." -- The acquaintance at the hotel?
  • Clarified.
• Allen, Missouri -- Worth a redlink? Or is it actually Glen Allen, Missouri?
  • This actually confused me, I think the source just said Allen, Missouri, I'll have to look into it some more.
  • Linked for consistency, Glen Allen is pretty far from where they were that day.

Missouri River and Fayette

• Why did you repeat Jesse James instead of just saying James?
  • His brother was actually a member of the gang too, spelled it out a bit.
• "bushwhackers" -- Is that formal?
  • No idea, I guess I could standardize it to guerrillas.

Raid on Centralia

• "and searching the town." - For what?
  • Anything they could steal that wasn't bolted down :)

2

2a

• "cold-blooded" - Source? (lede)
  • Removed quote, rephrased.
• "T. J. Stiles argues that Anderson was not necessarily a "sadistic fiend", but illustrated how young men became part of a "culture of atrocity" during the war." - Source needs to be directly after direct quotes
  • Good catch, done.

2b

• Standardise capitalisation and linking of publishers
  • Think I got it.

3

3a

• T. stands for...?
  • Tiberius :)
• "third in command" - Behind whom? (Texas)
  • explained.
• "including a congressman and a plainclothes sheriff" - Congressman? Probably has or worth an article if we know his name (Raid on Centralia)
  • Good point, I wonder why I didn't do that before.
• Frank James - Probably worth noting why his opinion matters (Raid on Centralia)
  • Noted
• "the body was photographed" - Does the source have the photograph? High EV (death)
  • Done.
• "owing to a cold winter and the defeat of General Price's forces" -- What battle? (death)
  • Rephrased.
• Any information about these historians? Credits or position?
  • Added a bit of context.

6

6a

• File:Jesse James.jpg needs an actual source (i.e. a web link) and proof that it is PD in the US (also, an author would be incredibly useful).
  • Changed to File:Jesse and Frank James.gif, I think it has all the right stuff.
• File:General Order No 11.jpg - Might be worth noting that it is also PD-100 for non-US reusers.
  • Noted.
• File:Bloody-bill-anderson.jpg - Estimated date of creation would be useful.
  • Can't find the exact date in the books (although I think it might be in there), added an estimated date.
• Also, added the picture of Anderson after he died. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

6b

• More information in the captions would show that the images belong. A look at Jesse James suggests that he wasn't too key in Anderson's group.

• AGF on offline sources. Article put on hold for one week Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

• Don't forget the "which" tag I added. Also, why is his DOB now 1839? Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
  • I had forgotten about the which tag, fixed now. The DOB was a mistake on my part, I must have put the wrong date down earlier for some reason.
• I think I've gotten almost everything, I wasn't sure what you wanted on the bit about Reed leading the gang though. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Pretty much it :-D . Replied about Reed above. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Checked the books again, it turns out that there was another mention of him that I had missed. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Alright, I'm ready to pass. Just going to leave this open for a day or two in case Accedie wants to weigh in. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Cool, I'm fine with leaving it open a few days--the more the merrier. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
    • Comments below :) Accedie^{talk to me} 01:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments from Accedie

I'd say it's pretty obviously GA with flying colors, but since I'm sure the authors won't be satisfied with that humble distinction, I'll be extra picky for the inevitable next round of reviewing :)

• Watch for "X was angered" (already mentioned this to Mark) – I think I refactored most of them to avoid the repetition, but there might still be one too many. So much anger here!
• Few other overuses: semicolons and dashes that could just be merged into longer sentences. Again, I did a little work on that, but it could probably stand a bit more. Not a big deal but annoying to us grammar nazis.
• Found several examples where it wasn't actually clear which part of the sentence was being referenced by a ref tag (the name? the date? the verb?), so I moved the tags to the end. Since a lot of them come out of the same book and often the same couple of pages, it might be worth going through and consolidating/getting rid of extraneous ones (Wood especially).
• Pet peeve: walls of text! I broke 'em up a bit with some level threes, but maybe they need better titles.
• More diverse sources, plz! Here's one that claims Union soldiers cut off Bill's head and stuck it on a telegraph pole, then dragged his body through the streets of Richmond...

Other than that, very nice article. Won't say it was a pleasure to read, but, well, you know. Instructive! Accedie^{talk to me} 01:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• • Thanks for the comments and all the help copyediting, the references and short sentences are perennial issues with me. The level threes look ok to me, if you can believe it, the walls of text were even worse on my first draft. Interesting that you bring up the head issue, I just happened to glace at a passage about it earlier today. It's likely apocryphal, but probably does deserve a mention. There are a few notes like that I will try to add soonish. Thanks again, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Since it's pretty clear that consensus is to pass this as a GA, I will do so on the assumption that Mark will try to add a bit more variety of sources in preparation for FAC Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks, yes, I shall endeavor too--I have a couple in mind already. Moving forward, I'll try to make sure I have enough historical background and add more notes about divergences between sources. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

To do

Add sfnm, note beginning of Civil War, add names of Jesse James & Anderson's films. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Explain context of Grant's remark re: Mississippi. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Culpability of Rocheport fire. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Where did they meet price (aftermath). Mark Arsten (talk) 22:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Mention alleged rape. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:18, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

A comment

I took the liberty of creating a category for him at the Commons (see here) and I also uploaded another (good) photo of him that might be useful (see here). --Lecen (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for doing that Lecen. That is a good picture, I'll try to get that into the article. For some reason, I seem to have the most issues with images during reviews. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Northern United States

I decapitalized the "N" in northern since this wasn't linked in the article. To have it capitalized would indicate that this was a separate nation, but I suppose if Northern United States was wikilinked in the article, then capitalizing the "N" would make sense. Proper wording should probably be from the northern region(s) of the United States.--MONGO 02:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Good catch, I think you're right. Our Northern United States article tripped me up, I think. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

1868 primary source

A thrilling record: : founded on facts and observations obtained during ten days' experience with Colonel William T. Anderson (the notorious guerrilla chieftain) (1868).

-- GreenC 02:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edits by User:BBAhistorian

This evening new user BBAhistorian has inserted several unsourced statements. I've warned the user on talk, and suggested strongly the editor discuss these edits here. I have no opinion about the assertions themselved; I merely contend they must be sourced on mature pagespace like a FA class page. I'll expect that editor to defend the statements with sourcing before reinserting. BusterD (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Concur with what Buster's said. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

I apologize for my ignorance of the proper procedures. The marriage of William T. Anderson and Bush Smith is listed on the LDS website at https://familysearch.org/search/record/results?count=20&query=%2Bsurname%3AAnderson%20%2Bmarriage_place%3A%22grayson%20county%20texas%22%20%2Bmarriage_year%3A1864-1864~

An image of the marriage license of Lieut. William T. Anderson and Miss Bush Smith is found at http://mv.ancestry.com/viewer/5c32da37-1a1b-466f-b8c8-381d2b4fe05a/72258479/48257080290?_phsrc=Sna783&usePUBJs=true I will provide a jpg image of the marriage license if the image on the Ancestry.com webpage listed above cannot be accessed.

Information from original sources is discouraged by Wikipedia. Surely authors rely on original sources for the most accurate information.

For what it is worth: DAILY TIMES [LEAVENWORTH, KS], January 24, 1865, p. 3, c. 2 Misses Mattie and Mollie E. Anderson, sisters of the notorious murderer, Bill Anderson, were, a few days ago, sent South beyond the Federal lines via Gaines' Landing, Ark. It is a pity a few more of these she rebels could not be carried from our sister State.

Anderson Family Group, based on 1840 census of Marion County, Missouri; 1850 census of Randolph County, Missouri, and 1860 census of Breckenridge County, Kansas. Parents: William C. Anderson, born about 1820 in Kentucky Martha Jane Thomasson, born about 1825 in Kentucky Children: William T. (Bloody Bill), born about 1839 in Kentucky or Missouri Ellis Anderson, born about 1841 in Missouri James Monroe Anderson, born about 1843 in Missouri Mary Ellen “Mollie” Anderson, born 1 January 1845 in Missouri Susan Josephine Anderson, born about 1848 in Missouri Martha Jane “Mattie” Anderson, born about January 1850 in Missouri Charles Anderson, born about 1859 in Kansas (Charles does not appear on the 1850 census. Perhaps Castel and Goodrich did not locate the 1860 Breckenridge County, KS, census)

Note "a" Wood speculates that the middle name of William T. Anderson was Thomas, his grandfather's name. William T. Anderson's maternal grandparents were William Thomasson and Mahala Baker, who was living in the household of William C. and Martha Anderson in the 1850 of Randolph County, Missouri. Incorrectly indexed as W. Lamason and Mahala Lamason. Both William C. Anderson and William Thomason were heads of household in Marion County, Missouri, in the 1840 census. William Thomasson and Mahala Baker were married 21 July 1818 in Hopkins County, Kentucky. (http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=2089&h=134850&ssrc=pt&tid=72258479&pid=48519590361&usePUB=true)

Grayson County Marriages (listed on LDS website; images available from Grayson County courthouse): Lieut. William T. Anderson and Miss Bush Smith, 3 March 1864 A. V. Doak and Mollie E. Anderson, 23 June 1865 (Alexander V. Doak and Mary Ellen Anderson)

• (J. M. Anderson and Malinda Anderson), 22 August 1866

E. G. Douglass and Mattie G. Anderson, 20 February 1867 (Elbridge Geary Douglass and Martha Jane Anderson) James Anderson and Mary Erwin, 21 October 1868 (James Monroe Anderson and Mary Lucy Erwin)

• (J. M. Anderson and Malinda Anderson) This MIGHT POSSIBLY have been the marriage of Jim Anderson and Bill Anderson’s widow reported by various authors. J. M. Anderson could have been James Monroe “Jim” Anderson. Malinda Anderson could have been Bush Smith IF these pieces of the puzzle fit together:

Bush Smith is not listed in the 1850 or 1860 Texas census.  There was a Smith family in Grayson County in 1860.  Burrell P. Smith, the first mayor of Sherman, died 3 September 1859.  (Obit reprinted in the Clarksville Standard, 3 September 1859.)  The petition of his widow, Sarah H. Smith, named their four children; Malinda A. Smith, B. P. (Burrell Perry) Smith Jr., Paulina Smith, and Virginia H. Smith. (Grayson County petition, August 1859.)  This Smith family is in Red River County, Texas, in the 1850 census.  B. P. Smith was 26; Sarah Smith was 19, and Malinda Smith was 10 months old when the census was recorded 16 December 1850 (1850 Texas Census, Red River County, microfilm page223, line 14.).  Jim Anderson was killed in 1871.  His widow, Mary Erwin Anderson married Burrell Perry Smith Jr. 17 December 1873. (Grayson County Marriage records.)  They named their first child, Bush Virginia Smith.  (Texas Death Certificate #24344).  Burrell P. Smith Jr. had a cousin named Bush Smith (1870 – 1896), buried in West Hill Cemetery in Sherman, daughter of Robert Meek Smith.  (FAG Memorial# 81619627)  Bush was a feminine name in this Smith family.  Finally, Grayson County marriage records typically listed the surname of the widow’s deceased husband rather than the widow’s maiden name on the marriage license.  If Malinda Bush were the widow of William T. Anderson, her name would appear in the marriage record as Malinda Anderson.

Deaths: Bill Anderson was killed 26 October 1864 (O R 52) Ellis Anderson reportedly was killed in a gunfight in Iowa. (Hearsay, no proof.) Jim Anderson was killed in the spring of 1871. (Family Bible of his sister-in-law, Mattie Erwin Maxwell, has a death date of 5 May 1871; Administrator of J. M. Anderson’s estate, B. F. Christian, provided a different death date, 14 April 1871, Grayson County Courthouse record.) Mary Ellen “Mollie” Anderson Doak and her husband, Alexander V. Doak were in Refugio County, Texas (1870 census); Denison, Grayson County, Texas (1880 census); Dallas, Texas (1891-1893, Dallas City Directory); Ardmore, Chickasaw Nation, Indian Territory (1900 census). Mollie died 7 November 1903 and is buried in the Rose Hill Cemetery, Carter County, Oklahoma. (Find A Grave Memorial# 19413992). Mollie and A. V. Doak were the parents of 3 children; Edith, William, and Claude. Josephine was killed 14 August 1863 in the collapse of the temporary Union jail in Kansas City. Maratha Jane “Mattie” Anderson and her husband, Elbridge Geary Douglass were in Refugio County, Texas (1870 census); Sherman, Grayson County, Texas (1880 census); Fort Bend County, Texas (1900 census). After her husband died, Mattie was in Murray County, Oklahoma (1910 census). Elbridge Geary Douglass was Chief of Police of Sherman, Texas; Sheriff of Grayson County; State Senator from Cooke and Grayson Counties; Superintendent of the Texas State Prison at Rusk; Manager of the State Penal Farm at Harlem, and the Gatesville Reformatory. (Obit) Mattie and E. G. Douglass were the parents of 5 children: William M. Douglass, Ida L. Douglass, Elbridge H. Douglass, Lulu M. Douglass, and Edith Marion Douglass. Charles Anderson reportedly died of a heat stroke about 1861. (Hearsay, no proof.)

I trust that the community will make any warranted revisions. 23.116.239.4 (talk)BBAhistorian —Preceding undated comment added 00:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

I find I'm ashamed of myself. I'll confess I came here partially to scoff at the newbie. That's a crass admission, but an honest one. It's not usually my way to make fun at the expense of others. However, I find myself impressed. I'm very sorry, BBAhistorian. Your assertion seems compelling and well sourced. That said, the threshold for reliable sources should preclude insertion of material based on the use of sources like marriage certificates and the otherwise estimable LDS genealogy website. It's a logical and not entirely unlikely assumption that the William T. Anderson mentioned in these sources is an entirely different fellow than the subject of this pagespace. On Wikipedia historical biographies we go by what professional historians have written. We DO NOT break new ground in biographies of well-documented historical figures.

For my part, I'm not sure BBAhistorian is even correct; I am however much impressed with the depth of the sourcing and familiarity with the genealogy BBAhistorian clearly has pursued. I'm interested in what page watchers like Ian Rose and Mark Arsten have to say. These fellows know the secondary sources better than I. BusterD (talk) 01:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

BusterD, thanks for the kind words. My research of William T. Anderson is primarily limited to William and his siblings in Grayson County, and following them for the rest of their lives. Genealogists use vital records (birth, marriage, death), census records, WWI draft cards, Social security death index, and cemetery records, supplemented with verified information from published books to create a paper trail of an individual's life. No source is infallible. No genealogy is complete, or without error. Please contact me at rollietaylor@sbcglobal.net if you would like jpg files of the Grayson County marriage licenses of William T. Anderson and Bush Smith; A. V. Doak and Mollie E. Anderson; and E. G. Douglass and Mattie G. Anderson, and a copy of the application for the administration of the estate of J. M. Anderson after his death in the spring of 1871, or other source records. BBAhistorian (talk)BBAhistorian —Preceding undated comment added 02:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks to BBAhistorian for doing all this research, very interesting stuff. I hid the three sentences that he had made edits about previously. I'll try to look into this more when I have time. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Chiming in, I have this on my watchlist because I reviewed its MilHist A-Class and Featured Article nominations, and my concern with recent edits was, like Buster's, more about process than content as I'm not expert on the subject/sources. I look forward to further discussion between Mark and BBAhistorian re. possible changes. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

RE: Birth year of William T. Anderson. Bill Anderson’s birth year of 1840 is widely accepted, and is found in published information and on memorials and monuments. Two contemporary records exist that indicate his birth year was earlier. The 1850 census of Marion County, Missouri, shows that William Anderson was 11. The 1860 census of Breckenridge County, Kansas, shows that William T. Anderson was 21.

1850 and 1860 census instructions to enumerators: Under heading 4, entitled “Age,” insert in figures what was the specific age of each person at his or her last birthday previous to the 1st of June. (Commencement of the census was to begin June 1st.)

William T. Anderson was born after June 1st, 1838, and before June 1st, 1839, IF the respondent provided the correct age of William T. Anderson to the enumerator, and IF the enumerator accurately recorded the information. Perhaps a more accurate source of the birth year of William T. Anderson exists. BBAhistorian (talk)BBAhistorian —Preceding undated comment added 01:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:William T. Anderson/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The portion dealing with Anderson's death is based on the premise that Wm. C. Anderson, of Brownwood, Texas, was telling the truth in his 1924 interview, in which he claimed to be "Bloody Bill." There is a mountain of documentation that his story was false, and absolutely nothing (other than his own story) to support it. (NOTE TO WIKIPEDIA EDITORS)The author of that portion of the Wikipedia article is one of a handful that clings to the old man's fanciful tale. He apparently believes that by pointing out the inevitable undotted "i"s and uncrossed "t"s in documented accounts, he is proving the validity of a story with no "i"s or "t"s. Charles R. Rabas

Last edited at 20:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William T. Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150722031121/http://cjonline.com/stories/012801/art_wildwoodboys.shtml to http://cjonline.com/stories/012801/art_wildwoodboys.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Reward poster deleted

I deleted File:Bloody-bill-anderson poster.jpg from this article. The caption claimed that it was "A bounty poster from September 28, 1864 signed by Edwin Stanton, the United States Secretary of War." But the text of the poster is in Arial, which was not designed until 1982. This is clearly not a Civil-War-era poster. Frankly, it looks like it was assembled from images found on the Web. The source of the image is an eBay seller, [1], which claims that it is a reproduction; but we will need a more reliable source than the word of a random eBay seller. —Bkell (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

T

What does the T stand for? Strange there's no mention of his full name. Does nobody know? VenomousConcept (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject banners

This article has been assigned to various WikiProject banners. These WikiProjects tend to focus on a specific topic area, specific parts of the encyclopedia or a specific kind of tasks. Many WikiProjects assess articles for quality and importance and the banners are used to maintain various statistics, and have the long term aim of improving coverage of their topic areas and helping every article achieve Feature Article status, like this one. The assigned WikiProjects consider this article to fall within their cope and to be of interest to them. If you disagree with this assessment, please discuss any proposed banner removal or rationalization of seemingly irrelevant WikiProjects, first, on this talk page and also raise the issue with the WikiProject(s) concerned. Changes that remove WikiProject banners are likely to be reverted. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 03:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)