Talk:Wild yak

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KingfisherL.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because...

Complete nonsense; this nomination shows ignorance of deletion criteria and specifically usage of same for species articles. This is a different species than the domesticated yak, and there is a huge amount of material on the topic, which has not yet been added merely because the article is only a couple hours old at this point. Please hold your horses, mate. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the frantic deletion attempts playing out, Anipad68, please note the following -

a) "you don't just delete a nomination like that" - yes I do; as is stated in the template message, if I'm not the article's creator and feel I have a good reason to object, I may do so. In this case, the deletion being clearly not "uncontroversial", your next step will have to be AfD. However, I advise you not to go that route because

b) there are good reasons for splitting Yak into a domestic and a wild form article. First, they are incontrovertibly classified as different species; have a gander at Yak. Generally we avoid such lumping in asingle article. Second, most information pertaining to the first is disparate from that pertaining to the second - population sizes, distribution, status, relationship to humans, etc. The split has accordingly been proposed before on the talk page but has not been carried out. I'm glad that an editor has been bold in splitting the article now, and although I have a suspicion that they don't intend to actually go to the trouble of fleshing out wild yak, I'll be happy to see to that today. If you are still unhappy with the result, I'd then ask you to raise the matter on Talk:Yak; if consensus is to undo the split then, go ahead by all means.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The “Long-hair fur forehead yak” a subspecies that is almost extinct no mention of it here but with a photograph in this informative article that is not mentioned in this wiki either.

It might be important to make a mention of it before it is gone alltogether: https://www.psr.onl/info/wild%20yak to include. Beautiful animal! (sorry if I break a rule, I don't get them) 2A02:A210:3044:1F00:949A:FA51:F127:AE5 (talk) 15:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Split material from yak[edit]

OK, split performed. Please see Talk:Yak for discussion.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The long quote[edit]

Is the long quote copy right violation because of it's length? KingfisherL (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe so; the applicable guidelines are somewhat vague about what constitutes an "acceptable length", but this example does not exceed what is common throughout WP, and I don't foresee any trouble about it. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:43, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Yak sauvage du Tibet.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]