Talk:Whitey (drugs)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is garbage, get rid of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.122.26.52 (talk) 02:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there really no more information on this? It seems to be an important issue when assessing the risks of Cannabis yet there is no information or research on it apparantly anywhere on the internet, at least none that goes into substantial detail. Wondering if any Wikipedians could improve this article?Protiek 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's fake, that' s why there's no information about it. 76.19.173.43 21:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Whiteys are real and they do happen, and you should really think about having some knowledge of the subject before you open your mouth
btw they really suck and I wouldn't advise going out of your way to have one (88.111.194.143 20:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Yup they're real, experienced one myself last month, not too pleasant. I felt really tired and threw up loads. Wafflecop 23:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can also attest to having several whitey's over a period of two years. They're usually triggered when smoking way more than normal in combination with not eating prior. I get hot/cold flashes and the overwhelming urge to lay down, feels similar to a panic attack. --174.6.21.169 (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. If I knew how to nominate this tripe for removal, I would have done it by now. Anyway, it's called "the Whirlies". The Real Walrus (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is even worth a page at all, but if it stays then someone should add that in Australia this is called greening out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.113.114 (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


What about temporary blindness? http://boards.cannabis.com/medicinal-cannabis-health/155978-temporary-blindness-while-smoking.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.125.150 (talk) 07:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

excellent article. not much more can explain the definition, despite the size this article is worthy of staying — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.7.5 (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]