Talk:White's

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:FOOD Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on White's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

google docs[edit]

Can be freely created - and are not published "reliable sources". Sorry. Collect (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The club's "sexist policies"[edit]

I suggested in an earlier revision that "sexist", unless put in inverted commas, is an inappropriate word in the lede for White's men-only policy, since it is pejorative (see the Wikipedia article on sexism). My addition of inverted commas was anonymously reverted, on the basis that "gender segregation is accurately described as sexist". As a matter of common English usage, I don't think that's right, since one can think of forms of gender segregation which it would be inappropriate to describe as "sexist". For the avoidance of doubt, I am not concerned to defend White's rules (which may or may not be justifiable), but only to exclude un-encyclopedic POV language . But what do others think?45ossington (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subject to contrary suggestions/objections, I am minded to substitute "single-sex policy" for "sexist policies".45ossington (talk) 10:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Kuranda?[edit]

His being a member is a joke / vandalism, yes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.18.186 (talk) 04:14, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, but I have removed it as original research (WP:OR) since it's unsupported (it may be true for a number of entries)... —PaleoNeonate – 09:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

died on April 30, 2019. Should be moved from Current Members section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.84.2.117 (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable members[edit]

Someone eliminated the whole members section, only a few current members now listed. Why dat? 24.4.136.172 (talk) 02:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added some notable former members in 2008, using Dod's Parliamentary Companion (which is cited non-specifically as a source). I'm sorry to see them all go.45ossington (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Rhodesian politician was a member of White’s. Should he not be included as a former member? He was notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. 2A00:23C7:E287:1900:E4A4:1AD:92BA:5D46 (talk) 17:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]