Talk:We Are What We Are (2013 film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
2 vs. 30em[edit]
Can NinjaRobot or his IP sock account (or anyone else for that matter) explain why 30em in the references template is "better"? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, so you've graduated from edit warring to baseless accusations. I see you still haven't reverted your 3RR violation. Keep it up, Lugnnuts. Keep it up. You're cruising for yet another block for disruptive editing. And now I don't particularly feel like discussing anything with you any more, except to say that the IP editor is right: 30em is the recommended style. It is your responsibility to make a case for not using the recommended setting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Funny how both of you are editing in turn to get your point across. Recommended does not equate to forbidden. Please point to the policy that forbids it. In the meantime, I'll change it back per your/IP edit. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, please. Your accusations are laughable at best. Forcing a specific number of columns is deprecated. That means the onus is on you to make a case for its use. If you can't, then you'll need to accept that consensus is against you. And, yes, the IP editor counts as a person, too. I doubt the IP editor will contribute to this discussion, but consensus is pretty easy to gauge. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- "I doubt the IP editor will contribute to this discussion" No shit. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, it doesn't hurt to extend an invitation, anyway... and you might want to extend a bit of good faith. Biting the IP editors is not conducive to getting them involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Once I see non-vandalism from IPs, then, and only then, I might extend a bit of good faith. I bet 99% of IP edits on your watchlist are not constructive. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, it doesn't hurt to extend an invitation, anyway... and you might want to extend a bit of good faith. Biting the IP editors is not conducive to getting them involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- "I doubt the IP editor will contribute to this discussion" No shit. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, please. Your accusations are laughable at best. Forcing a specific number of columns is deprecated. That means the onus is on you to make a case for its use. If you can't, then you'll need to accept that consensus is against you. And, yes, the IP editor counts as a person, too. I doubt the IP editor will contribute to this discussion, but consensus is pretty easy to gauge. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Funny how both of you are editing in turn to get your point across. Recommended does not equate to forbidden. Please point to the policy that forbids it. In the meantime, I'll change it back per your/IP edit. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Alyce Parker?[edit]
Nice, but who is Alyce Parker, listed as cast? She does not appear in the plot.--87.184.155.213 (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)