Talk:Wage curve

plotting the curve[edit]

As this article is about a curve, a plot of the relationship would be useful. --Selach (talk) 13:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

something someone unidentified said[edit]

This is very poor. The examples and the language are not clear.

I am not sufficiently familiar with the subject as yet to edit but there are far too many varables quoted Y, B, A, etc to make a good article.

Please revise.

response[edit]

Variables quoted A & B are random numbers, obviously. Any number you fill in will do fine as long as they're in accordance with the logistic operators (>, <, =). Nothing to revise about it. Some things are just too hard to explain in a simple manner and need some expertise on the matter to comprehend. Even in wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.118.50.26 (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

response on response[edit]

The "explanation" provided is poorly explained and not entirely relevant.

No-Shirking Model Compensating wage differentials Union Bargaining models

are the three commonly accepted explanations for the existence of the wage curve, of which the last one is the one that got most empirical support over the past couple of decades.

What you have stated is a criticism on the wage curve, rather than an underlying theory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.58.253.57 (talk) 11:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

and PS: <,=,> are logic or logical operators, a "logistic operator" is somebody who works in logistics :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.82.36.53 (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]