Talk:WBBH-TV

WBBH-TV has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 23, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:WBBH2.PNG[edit]

Image:WBBH2.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbbh 2007.jpg[edit]

Image:Wbbh 2007.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbbh anchors.JPG[edit]

Image:Wbbh anchors.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbbh weather.JPG[edit]

Image:Wbbh weather.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Happened to the Old Logos that were on this article??? I have noticed a lot of logos disappearing from Wikipedia, what is the deal with that???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.64.180 (talk) 16:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new wbbh logo[edit]

how would i go about loading the new wbbh logo since they moved into a new studio with new graphics and a new logo?--Jamesbondfan (talk) 21:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube live streaming[edit]

Is this the same station live streaming in YouTube since January 2021. It is not mentioned but have been searching information which is not available in Wikipedia. //arl (in Finland, Europe) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.157.84.67 (talk) 11:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 01:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:WBBH-TV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Tails Wx (talk · contribs) 02:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another GA review to start! Reviewing will take up to a week. Thanks! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
No concerns about copyright violations, nothing on Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool, pass!
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
No unstability issues with the article!
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Good work on the article, Sammi Brie! I have a few comments below:

Comments[edit]

Spotchecks[edit]

I spotchecked several sources, some of which didn't verify provided content.

Under Buerry, Burgess, and Hoffman: Early years: "proposing a station with a more intensive focus on local news than the only existing station in town, CBS affiliate WINK-TV (channel 11)." – the newspapers.com reference doesn't verify that WBBH-TV would focus more on local news than WINK-TV, WINK-TV isn't even mentioned in the reference.
- Tweaked
Also in the same section: "The station lost ABC programs to a new station in Naples, WEVU (channel 26), at this time as well." – now, the newspapers.com reference does state that WEVU would start programming, but doesn't verify that the station lost programming to WEVU.
- This one has to be inferred, unfortunately. Material mentioning that WBBH aired ABC programming is kind of rare, (e.g. this^[1]) but it almost goes without saying in this field.

That's fair; I'll take your word for it!

In section Waterman ownership, "...WEVU did likewise with channel 7 and changed its call sign to WZVN-TV the next year." – the newspapers.com clipping doesn't verify that WEVU changed its call sign to WZVN-TV, though it does verify that it was channel 7.
- Added another ref.

Prose[edit]

Just a few concerns:

"The studios were finished by the start of December, with erection of the station's transmitting tower in Lehigh Acres in progress." – how about "in progress" to "ongoing"?
"Waterman Broadcasting began to search for ways to expand the station in the early 1990s." – "began to search for ways to expand" to "began attempts to expand".
"...in all, there were 20 firings" – maybe the firings could be clarified a bit, to "there were 20 staff firings"?
- Changed all.

Other concerns[edit]

The image File:WBBH-TV (2014).svg, used in the infobox, is licensed under CC 4.0. Shouldn't it be used by a different license, like PD-textlogo? Pretty sure it's in the public domain, since it only consists simple geometric shapes or text.
- Bad logo uploaders strike again. Fixed.
Reference 30 is used in two locations. Can there be a specific page in the reference to use for the two locations?
- Added.

That's all I got! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 19:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx: Responded. The one item, unfortunately, was not mentioned directly. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sammi Brie, happy to promote this to a good article! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 01:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

^ "Please send me the address..." News-Press. Fort Myers, Florida. October 13, 1972. p. 13. Retrieved March 22, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.

[News1310Fr-1] "Please send me the address..." News-Press. Fort Myers, Florida. October 13, 1972. p. 13. Retrieved March 22, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.

[1]