Talk:Vladislaus III of Moravia

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 March 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 25 December 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Old page to be turned into a dab. Jenks24 (talk) 09:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vladislaus, Margrave of Moravia → Vladislaus III of Moravia – I'm proposing move to Vladislaus III of Moravia or Vladislaus III, Margrave of Moravia, cause he was not the only margrave of Moravia of this name. In fact he was third (after Vladislaus III, Duke of Bohemia (Vladislaus I as margrave of Moravia) and Vladislaus II of Moravia) so the current name could refer to all three of them (and may be reworked to disambig?). Silesianus (talk) 12:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~: This move seems quite logical.TheJack15 (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking confirmed sock Tiggerjay (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I agree if the current page name is used for the disambig as discussed in the proposal 1bandsaw (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.