Talk:Viscount Wimborne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is insufficient material for a full article on the 3rd Viscount. FunkyCanute (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be merged, as explained below. I remove the merger box. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1st Baron is a stub with little chance of becoming a fully-fledged article in its own right. Would be better to have a fully-worked article on Wimborne, with separate articles only for the more notable members of the family. FunkyCanute (talk) 10:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1st Baron article looks fine - 3rd V more problematic though he meets the notability requirement as a parliamentarian so we need some patience. Garlicplanting (talk) 10:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]