Talk:Viratnagar

India: Rajasthan / Geography / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 06:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bairat to Viratnagar[edit]

I have moved the page from bairat to Viratnagar because this if official and popular name of the place. For more details can be seen Rajasthan Tourism ViratNagar.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing subjective language[edit]

It looks like the language used in this article is not compatible with wikipedia guidelines. The speculations written in the captions under the photographs should be modified and I would suggest to remove few of these photographs unless proper sources are cited.

स्नेहल शेकटकर (talk) 14:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photographic perspective creating ambiguity for readers.[edit]

A rock formation may indeed seem a skull from one particular angle of photographic capture. Please avoid such ambiguous captions to images which implicitly peddles a personal perspective for a geological formation. For example, it has been conclusively proved that a mighty river (Saraswati) once flowed towards Kuchh peninsula. Present day Ghaggar is a remnant of that river. These rock formations might have formed the channel of that ancient river and may have undergone pot-hole drilling. Look at the smoothness of holes- very pot-hole drilling like. NaRaYaN (talk) 04:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]