Talk:Victoria Law
 | Victoria Law was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 18, 2018, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Victoria Law/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TheDragonFire (talk · contribs) 07:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- The article needs copyediting once prose issues are resolved.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- The lead needs expansion, and the proliferation of occupations will need to be cut.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- I have completed some of the needed cleanup, but we can deal with the remaining issues after the sources have been overhauled.
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- Most citations used by this article are primary sources, and will need to be replaced.
- C. It contains no original research:
- The citation to
Email from Victoria Law
is heavy original research.
- The citation to
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- The article is written in a somewhat fan-page style, with undue weight about her parenting and her cat, and editorialisation such as "
as an A student
".
- The article is written in a somewhat fan-page style, with undue weight about her parenting and her cat, and editorialisation such as "
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I am placing this article on hold pending improvements. I'm happy to expand my explanation of any of the above issues upon request, but there should be enough to get you started. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Status query[edit]
TheDragonFire, A21sauce, where does this nomination stand? It's been over a month since it was put on hold by TheDragonFire, which was acknowledged on their talk page by A21sauce, yet no edits have been made to the article. Thanks for taking a look at this. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
College, when?[edit]
Could someone look up when she went to Brooklyn College and incorporate that in there please, thanks--A21sauce (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Law graduated from Brooklyn College in 2002, per this listing of young alum awards: https://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/web/alumni/bcaa/awards/young.php Jennaf (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class anarchism articles
- WikiProject Anarchism articles