Talk:Verity Lambert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleVerity Lambert was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 18, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 30, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 12, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 22, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Doctor Who Anniversary[edit]

To whoever edited my portion about her death coming on the 44th Anniversary of Doctor Who, thanks. When I found out it wasn't quite correct I came here to delete it, but your solution is much better. Speednik (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture[edit]

Shld we have a VL in popular culture section? Rich Farmbrough 08:59 18 May 2006 (UTC).

What could go in it other than the Python sketch? Angmering 17:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World record holder[edit]

This will need to be verified, but a few years ago I heard a radio programme in the UK that claimed VL held the world record for the greatest number of television programme credits. In other words, her name appears in the end credits of more tv programmes (I think that means individual episodes of all the different programmes) than anyone else in teh history of television.

Its an interesting and curious claim to fame. One would immediately think of someone like Aaron Spelling so famous for so many US TV shows, but no, it seems that the answer is VL, a name unknown to most of the world unless you are "in the industry".

Can anyone else shed further light on this?

I certainly doubt she appears on the end credits of more individual episodes than the likes of Tony Warren (who gets a credit at the end of every episode of Coronation Street for creating it) or theme tune composers of other long-running series (such as Ron Grainer on Doctor Who, for example).
It's not a claim I have ever heard associated with her before, anyway.Angmering 06:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image?[edit]

Is there a suitably free image of Lambert as a young woman that we could use to illustrate, say, the BBC section? It would be nice to show her as the "tall, dark and shapely" young woman of the Mail article, and another image of Lambert herself would be preferable to all the images of studio buildings. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 04:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I put the studio images in because they were free and it seemed preferable to have at least *some* images in the article. However, I've not thus far been able to locate any free images of Lambert, hence the fair use claim screengrab at the top. Angmering 06:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can we claim fair use for another screengrab, say, one from the documentaries on Doctor Who: The Beginnning? Or does the fair use policy restrict us to one image per article? (I know that at WP:WHO we restrict ourselves to only one image per serial for serial/episode pages, but this seems slightly different to me.) —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 18:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is, I can only think of such documentaries using still images of the young Lambert — and as a screengrab of such an image would basically be a grab of a photograph, I'm not sure how the fair use rationale covers that. Pity the DVD of Nineteen Eighty-Four was cancelled, as I believe one of the extras on that was going to be an excerpt from the Late Night Line-Up episode from 1965 on which Nigel Kneale told her exactly what he thought of Doctor Who — could have taken a grab from that if it had come out. Plus of course I would just really like to see it... Angmering 19:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA[edit]

Passes on all counts. But I agree that for FA, the prose is somewhat difficult. Errabee 14:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lifetime achievement award[edit]

Not long before the recent sad news, Variety reported that Verity Lambert was to receive a lifetime achievement award this December:

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117976448.html?categoryid=14&cs=1

I'm not sure of the best place to put this. --The Brown Bottle 13:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ABC[edit]

Is it correct to show an image of the ABC studios in Manchester and say that Verity worked there? Both Granada and ABC had London offices and ABC had studios in London (at Teddington, pictured further on in the article where The Avengers among other programmes was made). Whilst all of Granada's tv work was made in Manchester, only a small part of ABC's output came from Didsbury. I suspect Verity was always London based - Sydney Newman certainly was and she was his secretary and then PA. A trivial point, I know, but one I felt worth raising.--Jtomlin1uk (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably true. I should have looked into this more when we first added the photos, but as the piece was so sorely lacking in visual material I thought it was nice to have them there... Should of course be removed if inaccurate. Angmering (talk) 18:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Thames Television, a successor company of her former employers ABC." Is this correct, or were they just successors to the London weekday franchise? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 12:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, they evolved from the same entity — Lambert herself says (on the Origins documentary on "The Beginning" DVD set) that ABC "later became Thames Television". I forget the exact details — I'm sure they're in our Thames article — but I think the ITC forced some sort of shotgun marriage between ABC and Associated-Rediffusion, and Thames was born out of that. Angmering (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps (on hold)[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.

  1. Some statements require citations. Some (but not all) of these may be argued to be inherent to the works, which can be argued, but a citation is preferable. Feel free to leave subnotes to each of these:
    "She then moved from administration to production, working on drama programming on ABC's popular anthology series Armchair Theatre. Armchair Theatre was overseen at the time by the company's new Head of Drama, Canadian producer Sydney Newman." (Early career in independent television)
    All direct quotes require direct citations, even if it's the same as the one at the end of the sentence/paragraph.(2 in "BBC career", 1 in "Thames Television and Euston Films")
    "In 1969 she left the staff of the BBC to join London Weekend Television, where she produced Budgie (1970–72) and Between the Wars (1973). In 1974, she returned to the BBC on a freelance basis to produce Shoulder to Shoulder, a series of six 75-minute plays about the suffragette movement of the early 20th century." (BBC career)
    The first paragraph of "Thames Television and Euston Films", especially the second sentence, which sounds very POV without a citation
    The fourth paragraph of "Thames Television and Euston Films", especially the last sentence
    The first paragraph of "Cinema Verity", especially the first sentence
    "A less successful Cinema Verity production, and the most noted mis-step of Lambert's career, was the soap opera Eldorado, a co-production with the BBC set in a British expatriate community in Spain." (Cinema Verity) Sounds very POV without a citation. The quotes below show that it was a misstep, but who said it was the most noted?
    The fourth and fifth paragraphs of "Cinema Verity"
  2. All one-two sentence paragraphs must be either expanded or merged with the surrounding paragraphs, as they break up the prose and disrupt its flow.
  3. The lead needs to conform to WP:LEAD. Specifically, it must not introduce information that is not present in the body of the article (like the information in the two quotes in the fourth paragraph) and must summarize every major point/heading made in the body of the article (there's little, if anything, on the "Early career in independent television" or "Cinema Verity" sections)

If all of the above concerns are addressed, I will return to check the references.

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Cheers, CP 01:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the concerns were not addressed, I will be delisting the article. If improvements are made, it may be renominated once all of the concerns have been addressed. Cheers, CP 17:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Death[edit]

Where did she die? Which organ was her cancer in? F W Nietzsche (talk) 14:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Verity Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verity Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verity Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sacked for...?[edit]

In 1956, she entered the television industry as a secretary at Granada Television's press office. She was sacked from this job after six months.

If you mention a sacking, it would be normal to explain what was the reason. If it was trivial, you would just say: In 1956, she worked as a secretary at Granada Television's press office. Valetude (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]