Talk:Velotype

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

In the Stenotype article, the max speed mentioned is 300 wpm, as opposed to this one mentioning 200 wpm. Does anyone use either of these keyboards?

As at 16 July 2005, the Velotype website contains a placeholder page. Midg3t 02:28, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the website to 'http://www.velotype.nl'. I'm not sure that it's correct, but it's certainly better than the .com website. Further, according to 'http://www.fastuk.org/organisation_details.php?Ref=886', this is the correct website for Velotype International, though the website says, 'Tuijnman Professional Services'. Chip Unicorn 17:44, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.velotype.nl is not the correct website. Amongst others, it states: "Wij verzorgen deze diensten met behulp van het Velotype toetsenbord. De Velotype maakt het mogelijk op spreeksnelheid te typen. Tuijnman Professional Services is opgericht door een van 's werelds beste Velotypisten, met meer dan 15 jaar ervaring op dit gebied. Wij zijn niet geaffilieerd met de producent van het Velotype toetsenbord.". Translation: "We provide these services through the use of the Velotype keyboard. The Velotype enables typing at the speed of the spoken word. Tuijnman Professional Services was founded by one of the world's best Velotypists, with more than 15 years of experience in this area. We are not affiliated with the producer of the Velotype keyboard.". And although http://www.velotype.com is not empty anymore (although most links from it still are), it is not the correct site either. The correct site is http://www.veyboard.nl. I was going to change the link, but just noticed that the article already has the correct link. wjmt (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dvorak[edit]

Why is there a link to Dvorak but not to QWERTY? What does that have to do with the current keyboard that QWERTY does not? This seems like an ad for Dvorak to me.

There is a link to QWERTY in the article. - DavidWBrooks 19:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]