Talk:Vector Fabrics, B.V.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have added a few links to other Wikipedia webpages that are relevant. I also added a category. --Chris.schaeffer (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

I have restored the conflict of interest template for the following reason: the article has been edited nearly exclusively by two editors, which in turn worked exclusively on this article (resp. added links from other articles to this one). These two editors have to make their relation to the article's subject clear before the template can be removed. – Adrian Willenbücher (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More neutral and verifiable[edit]

A few updates to the article to make it more neutral and verifiable:

  • rephrased biased statements (e.g. about Vector Fabrics being the earliest cloud-based tool provider)
  • added a whole lot of links to external articles about the company. This should allow the reader to verify the information.
  • based on the www.vectorfabrics.com website, I've updated the information about the products
  • added more internal wikipedia links to put the company in perspective
  • cut down the number of times the founders were mentioned :-)

I'd like to add a screenshot of the cloud-based Vector Fabrics tools running in a browser, to emphasize the difference with traditional client-based embedded design tools. However, I'm not sure what license I can and should use for the image. Can anyone advice me here? Thanks in advance!

Terechko (talk) 07:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New product, updated management team[edit]

I have updated the page to reflect the current products that the company offers, as well as the current state of the management team. Since I work at Vector Fabrics, I'm aware this is a COI :-)

I'm trying to keep a NPOV, but please let me know if any of the changes are biased, need to be reverted or require better citation.

Kristiankolev (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]