Talk:Vaan (Final Fantasy)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 03:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

G'day, mates! I am going to take a look at this article and see if there's any problems. Meanwhile, here's my first impression on the articles:

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
The prose is well-written.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
I have a doubt about the FF Shrine interview. The original source is at IGN, so you may want to replace that.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced reference.Tintor2 (talk) 13:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and made a pass on it. Nice work, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]