Talk:Untitled (How Does It Feel)/GA2
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. The article is very good. I have one question.
- Did you follow these guidelines: Wikipedia:Music samples? —Mattisse (Talk) 21:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes. Dan56 (talk) 22:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Final GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Well written
b (MoS): Follows MoS
- a (prose): Well written
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- a (references): Well referenced
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
- a (major aspects): Sets the context
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This is an excellent article. Congradulations! —Mattisse (Talk) 22:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)