Talk:Universe/GA2
Failed "good article" nomination[edit]
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 10, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?:-The lead section needs a lot of work (the universe in philosophy is not mentioned in the body). There is also a tag complaining about the informal tone in the article.
- 2. Factually accurate?:-There are citation tags all over the article. The lack of citations make some elements at least seem like original research such as the place underneath the formal tone tag. I would ask that you refrain from putting an article for a GA nomination with tags on the article, even if it is after an AID.
- 3. Broad in coverage?:-This article fails to consider philosophical and religous views on the origin of the universe.
- 4. Neutral point of view?:-Lack of citations and selective information would give the indication of POV, but I believe this is more a verifiability and broad in coverage problem.
- 5. Article stability?-No edit war that I can see
- 6. Images?:-Good amount of images
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far.
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
{{subst:#if:|
{{{overcom}}}|}}
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- {{subst:#if:|{{{2com}}}|}}
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- {{subst:#if:|{{{3com}}}|}}
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- {{subst:#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- {{subst:#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- {{subst:#if:|{{{6com}}}|}}
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- {{subst:#if:|{{{7com}}}|}}
- Pass/Fail:
--JEF 17:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)