Talk:USS Hunchback

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeUSS Hunchback was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 1, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 14, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the USS Hunchback was a steam powered ferryboat converted into a gunboat for the American Civil War?

GA-Failed[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I'm sorry, but I am going to have to fail this article. For one, there are only 3 references, and each paragraph should be referenced. Also, the article is very short and does not contain enough information. It is very well written, however, and it is a good start to a good article, but renominate it once these issues have been dealt with. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 13:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class fail[edit]

This article is not meeting criteria 3 - the lead section is very weak. Criteria 2 is questionable based on the length of the article. Brad101AWB (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]