Talk:UC Browser

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Websites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).

Compression claims[edit]

Doesn't most of the internet websites get sent as gzip compressed streams anyway? Feels like this should be mentioned somewhere in this article.

Untitled[edit]

It's a very popular mobile brower in China,more notable than its competitor like opera miniKsyrie(Talkie talkie) 13:14, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

It is actually the most used mobile browser in China See stats at: http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2011/08/q2_2011_mobile_1.html Gould80 (talk)

It might be the most popular now, but it's dropping quickly according to your source. Pretty soon it will no longer be #1. -Numbnumb (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Web Standards[edit]

Can someone mention in article about web standards this browser supports? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.213.87.50 (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Early versions[edit]

The article previously said that version 6.3 (November 2009) was the first release, which is not true, so I deleted it - I've been using this browser since at least 2006/2007. The oldest release announcement I can find on their website is version 2.3, in November 2004 ( http://www.uc.cn/a/news/2010/0404/1077.html ), but presumably they started from 1.0. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.108.42.46 (talk) 02:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page currently says that it was originally released in April 1990 as a J2ME package. No ref. This can't be true as Java didn't exist in 1990 and the web pretty much didn't either. Deleting. Davemc0 (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Criticism?[edit]

Most of the users do not know that the Internet traffic goes via some proxy servers, which is serious privacy concern and it is should be mention here too.62.21.0.148 (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interface[edit]

The interface is essentially a blatant copy of that of Windows 8's "Modern/Metro" IE version. The new tab page is done clumsily. Generally, it seems like an inferior IE copycat 46.173.12.68 (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

if you write an article about this elsewhere, you may include this opinion as an entry in the Criticism section, along with a citation linking back to that article BenLeggiero (talk) 14:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last sentence of opening paragraph reads like investor pitch[edit]

The language and information could be toned down to sounds more neutral rather than promotional.

Is no longer only a mobile browser[edit]

This browser have a lot of systems availables so it's no longer only a mobile based browser. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.134.39.248 (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are all mobile platforms BenLeggiero (talk) 14:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]