This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
So that I understand better going forward, why was "Dicken's 'Ivy Green'" edited to "Dickens 'Ivy Green'", shouldn't it be treated as a possessive, like in "Van Gogh's work"? Thanks much!--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I only half corrected the error. The author's name is Charles Dickens. So the possessive should be Dickens' (not Dicken's). Here we should have "Dickens' Ivy Green". I think I've fixed it correctly now. - Ipigott (talk) 20:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Sometimes I'm a bit of a "ready, fire, aim" girl -- that's why they turned me down for sharp-shooting school. : )
You're right about my mix-up on "Danish" vs. "Dutch" Golden Age. Thanks.--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
