Talk:Trade diversion

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Lamb Example[edit]

Are there any sources for any of this section? I've never seen French lamb in UK supermarkets, whereas New Zealand lamb is widespread when English or Welsh lamb is out of season, and France produces far less lamb than the UK or New Zealand do according to the lamb Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.152 (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to statistics from the UK's Agriculture and Horticulture Development board (http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk/markets/industry-reports/uk-statistics/), the UK currently imports 5 times as much lamb from outside the EU as it does from inside the EU, with the largest EU supplier of lamb (Ireland) being around 1/7th the size of New Zealand, a situation that has been the case for several years. In light of this, I think it's unlikely that New Zealand lamb imports being replaced with French lamb imports is an example of trade diversion.

Merge from Trade creation[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was no consensus to merge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trade creation and trade diversion are (EDIT) related effects of same concept. It makes sense to use one article to write about these effects in the same place. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on the grounds that diversion and creation are different independently notable concepts. I accept that they are linked because they both arise as consequences of the formation of some form of customs union. They are already appropriately linked in the text as part of the template:trade bloc series (in the 'Policies' section). Klbrain (talk) 07:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References from AfD[edit]

Possibly useful reference from the ArticleForDeletion dicussion:

Preferential Trade Agreements, Trade Creation and Trade Diversion
"The terms trade creation and trade diversion are closely associated with Chicago School economist Jacob Viner (The Customs Union Issue, 1950)." from Trade Creation
Trade Diversion and Trade Creation
Migration, Spillovers,and Trade Diversion: The Impact of Internationalization on Stock Market Liquidity
Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the Canada - United States Free Trade Agreement

Jonpatterns (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]