Talk:To Die For

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema / New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:To die for imp.jpg[edit]

Image:To die for imp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ending[edit]

Look whoever you are iam the reason who changed the ending because i believe that the last scene where Janice skating around on a lake similar to suzannes doing her ice skating symbolizes that she will one eday follow suzannes legacy why are you changing it to original WHY?

(MartyTholath)--------- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martytholath2 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the ending again and whoever you are dont change it ,Let it stay this way and i want to know WHY YOU DONT LIKE MY IDEA WHY (talk —Preceding comment was added at 17:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article name[edit]

I think for this one, it should be To Die For (1995 film), since there are other films with this title. --FrancineFan3883 23:31, June 20th, 2011 (UTC)

Unless you're contending that this film wouldn't be the primary topic, what you're proposing would be against guidelines. Doniago (talk) 18:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. To Die For is being treated as the primary topic, the one that readers are most likely to look for, so it needs no disambiguation. If another topic besides any of the films was a primary topic, then we would disambiguate the 1995 film from the other films. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary needs work[edit]

The plot summary is a complete mess and is lacking in detail. The actually movie is told slightly out of order and is narrated by those involved with the story. This should be reflected in the plot summary. And a little more detail is needed in the led up to the murder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.103.39.112 (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on To Die For. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent Rumors About Inspiration for Suzanne Stone Character[edit]

TO DIE FOR is based on a true story, Pamela Smart's persuading her teenage lover and his friends to murder her unwanted husband. But media and celebrity gossip have also long claimed that the Suzanne Stone character, and specifically her extreme methods of jobhunting, are based on an actual newswoman. This should probably be mentioned. Younggoldchip (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the lead of the article? DonIago (talk) 17:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Smart was an ordinary evil conniver, not a journalist or newswoman. The main character in TO DIE FOR is supposedly (in terms of her methods for attaining upward mobility in the media) based on a newswoman whose name we would recognize. Younggoldchip (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a sourced statement in the article that links to a news article that claims that the main character in the film is based on Pamela Smart. Do you have sources that make claims to the contrary? DonIago (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]