Talk:Thomas Goolnik

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Freedom of speech

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I find the multiple edits made by 149.18.42.68 on 1 December 2015 quite interesting. They all appear to add editorial/opinion content. It might be good if someone could scrutinize them. 213.202.124.181 (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. I wrote the original, I think I wrote it in a fair way, and agree that the edits add an editorial slant that favors the subject of the article. But I don't want this to become my personal crusade. It would be nice if someone else would pick that up. Pgramsey (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this article seems to be the focus of a reputation management effort. Metalliqaz (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it happened again...[edit]

See: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20181003/23545140776/thomas-goolnik-gets-google-to-forget-our-story-about-him-getting-google-to-forget-stories-about-thomas-goolnik.shtml 24.20.239.63 (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And again: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190320/09481541833/thomas-goolnik-again-convinces-google-to-forget-our-story-about-thomas-goolnik-getting-google-to-forget-our-story-about-thomas.shtml --Ehitaja (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]