Talk:ThinThread

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

needs more citations[edit]

i've no idea where the middle part of the article is from. it needs citations. and better organization and wording. Decora (talk) 18:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Show segment[edit]

The hard info is a little obscured by the effort to entertain, but there is some info here:

http://vimeo.com/47363427

Bustter (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prevention of 9/11[edit]

According to several sources, this could have prevented 9/11 by casting a narrow net on selective targets. This needs to be discussed in the article. Viriditas (talk) 02:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's just speculation, inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. — DAGwyn (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If NORAD and several allied foreign intelligence agencies didn't have the political weight to stop 9/11 then I doubt a few more intelligence analysts would've been able to call off such a well-orchestrated false flag attack and media cover-up. The important part of this article is the "auditing system to monitor how analysts handled the information, in order to prevent misuse". Without auditing, people who abuse the surveillance network with conflicts of interest have zero accountability, and can get away with treason. 2001:1970:529E:EC00:4113:E56B:8595:2A0E (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:53, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]