Talk:The State of Texas vs. Melissa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was no merge.  Ved havet 🌊 (talk 11:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the person is more notable than the film so I would support the content of this page being merged into the Melissa Lucio article. Seen as the film is essentially about her that makes the most sense to me. It is ludicrous to have two separate pages for this subject. Inexpiable (talk) 22:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed. Why give a killer multiple pages on a leading platform? Court of law found her guilty. She isn't a public figure or a martyr, she's a convicted murderer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:301B:B:5A00:149D:8D1A:3A3D:BE03 (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Your opinion about Lucio's case is completely irrelevant. Ved havet ≈ (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The documentary is not synonymous with the person. Many other issues have separate pages. In regards to another comment, Wikipedia pages is for objective not subjective opinion. 2406:3400:20F:6B50:CDC4:31BE:53E9:CC5B (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the film is notable in its own right, it should have a separate article. If it is not, it probably does not merit mentioning in the article about Lucio. 2603:8081:2600:400:E19F:BBED:DF15:11F0 (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Separate topics, each notable in its own right - an award-winning film is worth am article, so is a high-profile court case. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.