Talk:The Secret (The Office)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Secret (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Secret (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 25, 2012Good article nomineeListed
January 11, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Secret (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman 04:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • If so, you should post "second opinion" on the good article nominatins page. The article isn't on hold until you make it on hold. :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:29, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean to say that i need some votes (Support/oppose) and sorry for that it's not in hold Greatuser (talk) 06:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    You're supposed to be the one who casts the final decision. GAN is a bit different than FAN or GTN. :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll provide a review since I can't tell whether a review's going to be done here. Here's what I found:

  • "John Krasinski's named is spelled Krasinksi throughout most of the article; fix that.

That's the only issue I found, fix that and I'll pass this. Wizardman 04:14, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just fixed it myself since it took about ten seconds, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 03:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Secret (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]