Talk:The Rape of Nanking (book)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I am reassessing this article as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

OK, no problems here, on to main review. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:58, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • The article is reasonably well written. I made a couple of minor copy-edits to address poor grammar. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    • Citations are to RS, I assume good faith for printed cources. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • There has been edit-warring in the past but article is currently stable. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
Is this good? [1]. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that will do fine. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • Images suitably captioned.
  2. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    • On hold for the fair use rationale to be sorted out. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, that has been addressed, confirm GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Rape_of_Nanking_(book)/GA1&oldid=299167630"