Talk:The Positronic Man

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Co-authors[edit]

Did Silverberg work with Asimov on the 1992/1993 novel? Or merely "novelize" the 1976 story with Asimov's blessing?

Here is my annotation and comment at Robert Silverberg, where the collaboration needs attention

The Positronic Man (1992), Silverberg with Asimov —based on the 1976 novelette The Bicentennial Man by Asimov [!-- source is our book article; also see also http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?17097 http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?41611 -->

--P64 (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

Could someone please delete the end of the book spoiler from the second paragraph? The fact that he is declared human at the very end of the book is a major plot point that should not be ruined for potential readers. It does not belong in the introduction to the page. That's what the Plot Summary is for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RZero79 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not remove information from articles because someone might see it as a "spoiler". Per WP:SPOILER: "Spoilers are no different from any other content and should not be deleted solely because they are spoilers." Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 10:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]