Talk:The Madness of George III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. Prolog (talk) 17:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The Madness of George III (play)The Madness of George III — At present "The Madness of George III" is a redirect to "The Madness of King George" i.e. the film. Although the film version is probably better known, the play is not that obscure, given that it was filmed under a different name the play should be treated as the primary meaning of its own name. PatGallacher (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. There's no confict between titles here, so the play and film should each be at their actual titles. Of course, each could have a hatnote to the other. Station1 (talk) 02:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Station1. In the meantime, I have edited the redirect to point here, to the play article. Propaniac (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Plot summary?[edit]

It would be very useful for this article to have a plot synopsis of this play, especially for people who might be interested in knowing in what ways the play differs from the film adaptation. Newjerseyliz (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]