Talk:The Language Conservancy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DePROD'd Sources that would make it meet WP:GNG[edit]

Here's a Source Assess table I prepared. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 20:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/new-resources-to-help-preserve-endangered-stoney-nakoda-language Yes The Calgary Herald has no known association with the Language Conservancy Yes The Calgary Herald is a generally reliable newspaper Yes The article is about the Language Conservancy working to preserve a language. Yes
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2016/06/06/bloomington-organization-fights-save-native-american-languages/84593348/ Yes IndyStar has no known affiliation with the Language Conservancy Yes IndyStar is a generally reliable newspaper for Indianapolis area news Yes The article is wholly about the Language Conservancy Yes
https://www.kulr8.com/community/digital-dictionary-helping-crow-language-thrive/article_7604f76e-3dc6-11ec-bcf6-df3db5d1eda5.html Yes KULR8 has no known affiliation with the Language Conservancy Yes While local news stations are not always the most reliable, KULR8 is reliable in this story as there is no reason to doubt the information provided within and nothing known to contradict this information Yes The article is about an app the Language Conservancy built Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.