Talk:The Kids Are All Right (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Kids Are All Right (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Disambiguation with The Who movie?[edit]

I thought Colondenko had to have been too young to have directed the classic The Who movie, "The Kids are Allright", so I think some disambiguation with that is called for. I'm also wondering if there was ever any threat of legal action by those with a proprietary interest in the older movie.

Mexican gardener[edit]

What about the Mexican gardener who got fired. You didn't mention him I think. Jidanni (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, him. "Luis". Poor guy. It was only a supporting role, though. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 22:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TV Series[edit]

The TV series has been reported on by multiple outlets and qualifies as notable enough for inclusion on wikipedia. The fact that it has not been picked up yet does not mean it should not be included on the page. Many articles on films include notes about sequels or remakes that have not entered any stage of pre-production yet, for example, Sin City (film), 9 to 5 (film), How To Marry A Millionaire. I don't see how a sequel that has not yet even entered pre-production, or even been confirmed as happening in the case of 9 to 5, is any different from a tv series which has not yet been picked up. In fact, it seems to me that there should be a note about it even if it never gets picked up ("a tv series based on the film was planned but never materialized.) For example, The Golden Compass (film) notes that plans for a sequel have essentially been cancelled.Schnapps17 (talk) 05:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it hurts to mention that Cholodenko would like it to happen, but maybe just not under its own section quite yet. --Lobo512 (talk) 10:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it matters what other articles do. In the entertainment world, this kind of thing happens all the time and comes to nothing. We are not a newspaper that reports on every item that is in talks, being discussed, being planned, etc. At this point, it doesn't belong in the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Kids Are All Right (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100130090405/http://showbiz411.blogs.thr.com:80/2010/01/26/julianne-moore-annette-bening-in-sundance-sensation/ to http://showbiz411.blogs.thr.com/2010/01/26/julianne-moore-annette-bening-in-sundance-sensation/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Key Points Tag from Feb 2017[edit]

Regarding the lead section key points tag, per the WP Style Guide, "At minimum, the opening sentence should identify the following elements: the title of the film, the year of its public release, and the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified." These are all covered. In addition, this article has a detailed plot section covering all the key points. It is not helpful to the reader to be overly redundant in the lead section. The tag seems to be overkill, and that is the reason why it is being removed. GetSomeUtah (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]