Talk:The Aethra Chronicles

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (3 participants)
Joshua Tomar (4 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (nom)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Kenshi (Mortal Kombat) (nom)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

objection to proposed deletion[edit]

This is an old game with 3 references. However, the walkthrough reference does not really add any value, so for this comment I only consider the first two named references (http://www.blimix.com/aethra/ and http://netsilik.nl/Aethra/).

These two sources both provide valuable information on the history of this game. Both these two websites could be classified as 'fan websites' because they are neither game review websites nor the official publisher/creator website. However, they cannot be considered fan websites in the typical sense of the word: those two websites both seem to be dedicated to making information available that would otherwise be lost; they are the primary sources of information for a game that was released in 1994. The second website even lists reviews from the time of release.

I agree that the article could do with some improvements, but deleting it outright won't invite anyone to make it a better article. In conclusion: the proposed deletion is opposed. 92.158.53.164 (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]