Talk:Teen Wolf (1986 TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The included picture is quite grainy, and the shrunken version that appears on the article page is even worse than the original. Is it possible to get a better one? Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 02:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Teen Wolf cartoon.jpg[edit]

Image:Teen Wolf cartoon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Teen Wolf (2011 TV series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear wording[edit]

The sentence “ the cartoon series delivered very powerful critiques of disability as civil rights. “ feels unclear: is it stating that disabilities should not be regarded as such, or is it a list, or something else? Thebest8382 (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While that text or a version of it has been in the article since inception, it's never been sourced or elaborated upon. I've consequently tagged it as being original research, and will remove it in time if no supporting sources appear to be available. Thank you for bringing this to our attention! DonIago (talk) 02:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]