Talk:Tedd Pierce

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / People Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animation people work group.

Fleischer Studios[edit]

Tedd Pierce (as "Ted Pierce") also did story work at Fleischer Studios, but there is no mention of his work at Fleischer as I write this. Can someone fill in the Fleischer years? Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McKimson: 2B or Not 2B?[edit]

The text reads: "In his Warners career, Pierce worked with three of the three best-known Warner animation directors (Jones, McKimson and Friz Freleng). […] However, because much of Pierce's Termite Terrace career was spent with McKimson's unit (McKimson considered the least-known Warners animation director), it would follow that Pierce was generally overshadowed by his contemporaries as story writers at Warners, Warren Foster and Maltese."
So, is McKimson considered "best-known" or "least-known"? And for that matter, what does "three of the three best-known" really mean? Did the writer mean "three of the exclusive set", or "all three in the exclusive set of three"?
The excessively protracted description of Lovelorn Leghorn feels randomly stuffed into this graph; this I'm removing, but the other ambiguities I leave for now because I don't know which way to correct at this point. ~cailan (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]