This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Note: Wikipedia indicates The Sun as a depreciated source, except when it comes to matters of football/soccer.— Preceding unsigned comment added by CT55555 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WP:THESUN states: "Some editors consider The Sun usable for uncontroversial sports reporting, although more reliable sources are recommended." When "more reliable sources" are available as is the case, why would we use The Sun?
WP:THESUN also states: "References from The Sun […] should not be used for determining the notability of any subject". The section The Sun reference was removed from was "Notable members"… Robby.is.on (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Someone just removed it and I am fine with that. CT55555 (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
