Talk:Tamralipta

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bengal, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.BengalWikipedia:WikiProject BengalTemplate:WikiProject BengalBengal articles

India: West Bengal Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled[edit]

The description of archaeological work seems to be verbatim transcription from an article by Amita Ray and Kaushik Gangopadhyay at <http://banglapedia.net/HT/T_0040.HTM>. A careful reworking of this topic seems to be needed.Fconaway 09:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As is typical with just about anybody and anything from Bengal and that is Bengali, this article has one sole reference which is a Bengali site, and is participated in 100% by Bengalis. Neither does the one solitary reference cite its sources, nor is it a completely reliable site itself, and references to the Mahabharata should ideally (as it does on other Wikipedia articles) quote the appropriate Sloka(s) from the epic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.35.217 (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the factual accuracy tag since it seems the user has some prejudice against Bengalis; Just because the source is from a Bengali origin does not automatically make it questionable/dubious. Furthermore other literary sources have been added (although they need to be cited inline) Reahad (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reference[edit]

reference 1 & 5, both are same. plz adjust them. শৌমেন মান্না (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]