A fact from Symphoniae sacrae I appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Heinrich Schütz published his Symphoniae sacrae I, a collection of 20 "eloquent, sensitive, and often sensuous" settings of biblical texts, in 1629 in Venice, where he studied with Monteverdi?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Nikkimaria, the title of this piece is Symphoniae sacrae. He wrote two more under the same title, so "our" I, II, III is only good for disambiguation, not the title. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a subtitle, and it looks like most of the sources are indeed considering it as part of the title. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the sources need to do some dab, but - repeating - it's not the composer's title. Should we introduce a new parameter "disambiguation", for formality's sake? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No - if they use that presentation, we can certainly do the same. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
