Talk:Squatting in Ukraine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:SQUAT[edit]

There are over one billion squatters worldwide and the phenomenon is under-represented on Wikipedia. Join Wikipedia:WikiProject_Squatting to help write articles about squatting in every country, or drop a message on the talkpage about something else you'd like to see covered. This is just one of many ways to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia! Mujinga (talk) 15:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Squatting in Ukraine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 09:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Prose[edit]

Review[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    The only issues I noticed were related to prose quality. NPOV is difficult to gauge due to the political situation, but I assume it is neutral. I made very minor edits to the prose linked above. Please review. Viriditas (talk) 11:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the edits and the review! Mujinga (talk) 11:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 06:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

View of Honka clubhouse
View of Honka clubhouse

Improved to Good Article status by Mujinga (talk). Self-nominated at 08:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

    • This article is a newly promoted GA and meets the newness and length criteria. The hook facts are cited inline and I am approving the original hook only, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. ALT 1 is unsuitable because the Revolution of Dignity is not mentioned in the article. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]