Talk:Sources of law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

the phrase sources of law is like a chameleon discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.27.170.130 (talkcontribs) 18:05, 4 April 2008

Broken citation 2601:3:1B80:70D:F147:CD68:F4BF:9C21 (talk)

Rewrite[edit]

This article needs a comprehensive rewrite, which I shall shortly attempt. Arrivisto (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article expansion : 'Legitimacy of law'[edit]

@Arrivisto:

Seeking your openion to insert and expande a section ==Legitimacy of law==

Case:

Legitimacy of law -(not to be confused with Legitimacy (family law))- is a broader concept. That needs to pass en:wp notability test of "A topic is primary for a term with respect to long-term significance if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term." (see WP:PRIMARYTOPIC)

Google search is giving 67,800 searches If I put the term "legal legitimacy", out of that 12,000 searches in google books. "legitimacy of law" term gives 1,090,000 google searches out of that 142,000 are google book searches.

After primary research I collected following almost a dozen online refs. But still I lost a discussion to seek article titles Legal legitimacy or Legitimacy (law) (mainly due to english language grammar issues); these title now stand diverted to article legitimacy.

Since undersigned does not have any other avenue & wants to expand this article with section ==legitimacy of law== and would like know your openion in the same regard, since you have already worked on this article.

Mahitgar (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

refs for Legitimacy of law[edit]


@Mahitgar; Feel free to edit the page. If your edit is sound and is properly referenced it will stand on its merits; but of course it is likely to be amended, added to or even deleted by other editors. Good luck! Arrivisto (talk) 10:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]