Talk:Sound on Sound

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updates[edit]

Can this article please have 'stub' status removed? Thanks in advance. SOSJennifer (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd chuck in some facts from recent editions to give a little more background on the magazine. --DavidP 23:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no move per discussion below. There doesn't seem to be a clear consensus to make an exception to our usual house style in this case. If such a consensus develops in the future, then we can revisit this proposal. - GTBacchus(talk) 01:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Sound on SoundSound On SoundRelisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC) This is how the magazine styles itself, similar to Iphone v iPhone. OpenPaladin (talk) 13:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support If a move like this is uncontroversial, just put a {{db-move}} on the redirect that you need to get out of the way and then move it yourself. ErikHaugen (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Beg pardon, it does appear from guidelines such as WP:MOSTM that we should keep titles like this "correct" rather than how the magazine writes it. ErikHaugen (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The magazine actually uses all caps "SOUND ON SOUND" - they just use a different colour for the initials. It is self evident from the picture in the article. Roger (talk) 09:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, plenty of references on the website and Facebook page using capitalized "On", seems perverse to do it differently unless we can show that third-party sources do it differently. (The wide use of the abbreviation "SOS" also speaks for the capitalized "O".)--Kotniski (talk) 13:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Consensus at WP:MOSTM seems to indicate that we should not, even if it might seem perverse. The exception to this rule are for things like iPhone and eBay, but apparently not for things like this. Please read that guideline and let me know if I'm reading it wrong. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, you're probably reading it right, except the bit at the top that says there will be occasional exceptions. I think if there's no usage at all for the current form of the title, while there is frequent usage of the proposed form, then it's a pretty good case for an exception to be made.--Kotniski (talk) 06:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose because the convention is to prefer WP:CAPS over the subject's own spelling preference. Jafeluv (talk) 08:27, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Disambig for band[edit]

There also was a late-60s garage band from Tidewater, Virginia by that name. Their 1968 song Girl, you've got to turn me on[1] (released on the obscure Tunnel Records label, obviously not identical to modern-day Tunnel Records from Germany, sound quality and most of the verses are pretty crap, but the swirling chorus had definite hit potential) is on rotation on the 60s garage, psychedelia, and British Invasion station Beyond the Beat Generation [2]. Discogs entry for the single: [3]. According to Allmusics.com[4], it seems to have been released on a 2001 sampler called Aliens, Psychos & Wild Things Vol. 2. And here's an article on the band on Garage Hangover: [5] --2003:56:6D1B:C614:D829:8DF2:A704:6AC (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the current title of the band article? The only other similar article I could find is Sound on Sound (album). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such article for the late-60s band so far. Just saying that there's some work to be done here. Many disambig pages have lots of skelletal information for things that don't have their own articles yet. --2003:56:6D1B:C627:9934:1162:2DE9:AF41 (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YmnuPpbanzPEIRoogiry0Pprbh6emhFS/view?usp=drivesdk 2603:6080:3509:1096:E88E:6269:AB3F:FBA5 (talk) 05:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]