Talk:Songbird Airways

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

Fair use rationale for Image:SkyKingInclogo.jpg[edit]

Image:SkyKingInclogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SGB737.jpg[edit]

Image:SGB737.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added Accidents and Incidents section[edit]

I added a section on Accidents and Incidents based on a verifiable incident involving this airline. It is consistent with other airline articles. My previous edit was reverted with the reason given "does not meet standards" so I'm opening this section to better discuss how to incorporate this information.Shiner1718 (talk) 15:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/page content. Mechanical problems with no serious damages and injuries are not notable. HkCaGu (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I've removed the section unless I can find something that indicates there was serious damage to the airframe.Shiner1718 (talk) 18:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet[edit]

I've had a look around at the claim that the airline has a 1-11 in its fleet, and as far as I can tell, it does not appear to be airworthy, and is certainly not flying. I was wondering if That should be stricken off the table, as it appears to be parked up in a bone yard and without engines. The BAC one-Eleven page lists the type as retired. So I would recommend something been done about this. I would edit it, but recently I've found many wiki-users to be not super friendly about editing their pages. Regards 747-200B 19:49 21 MAY 2019 (UTC)