This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
This article does not completely cover the information on its subject for instance there is preciously few information on the film's release and it doesn't even cite any sources! Also it is missing information on the film's production. Information should be added to all the sections that I have tagged in this article in order to cover the article in more detail.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Some time has passed after my last post here about getting this article expanded. Looking at it again it seems whoever attempted to do so also seemed to make it worse which is unfortunate. Most of the citations are useless considering they all come from the same site (Amazon.com). There is also the major problem of the format of the citations which are just the URL of the site the info was taken from, but since most of the sources are from Amazon.com there should be more effort to find better sources (I usually used AllMovie's release listing), only when no other source is found that using Amazon should be taken into account. The writing style of the article seems to be composed of the listings of all the companies that have distributed it over the years which doesn't meet Wikipiedia's Manual of Style. A complete rewrite might be necessary in order to get the article in shape. Now all of this is not any detriment to whoever did the expansion, unless they were vandalizing the article. This is merely a critique meant to help get this article in top form. That being said, there is a lot of things that needs to happen in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article. Hopefully someone comes along and gives this article the proper attention its needs.--Paleface Jack 17:55, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
