Talk:Skydance Animation

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Filmmaking / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American / Films / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.

Tables[edit]

@ZX2006XZ, @Indagate, i know this is complaticed but this is a new studio we're dealing with. When a film is released, it's needs a section like Skydance Media. Making a reception section would take more than one film since Luck is released. Indagate, you were right about no table needing numbers, the films aren't connected to each other so numbering them is redundant and waste of space. ZX2006XZ, the budget for Luck was about around $140-200 million. much like The Good Dinosaur. i'm sure if we can put aside our differences, there's need to fight over something that needs to be fixed. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Follow as Skydance Media is.[edit]

@Indagate @ZX2006XZ I propose we not add any writers or producers since i wanna make it like Skydance Media is with their films. directors and composers will stay but no adding any EP, Producers or Writers. We can't overload too much. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Writers are important part of the production process and should be listed, they're more important than composers Indagate (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about the producers? Nothing but John Lasseter and the duo of Skydance David and Dana? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Indagate:. Writers play an essential part in the making of a film, be it story or the screenplay itself, or even both. To not include wouldn't be a good idea. ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But this is Skydance Media we’re talking about. They don’t have directors, producers or anything. Just movies and companies. They don’t have directors or anything listedin there due to their live action media. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If want to discuss Skydance Media#Released, then please do so at that talk page instead of here. Why make these two pages consistent? They seem to have different scopes as the films listed there are barely connected. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 17:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Idk. I didn’t know much about Skydance til Geostorm. They have different companies after all. Interactive, New Media, even Sports. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

I know we shouldn’t add the reception now, @Indagate. But i kept it hidden til the next film comes out. No need to remove it but it’s making the table too big for me to handle. I added producers and writers in but the space is cramping up. So i made a hidden reception part just to reduce the spacing between them. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Released and upcoming[edit]

i propose how we handle the writing column for the released and upcoming. We will not credit the writers in the upcoming until the film is released. It is unknown if it’s from a screenplay or a story but helps to reduce the spacing of the page. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Films list[edit]

Way too many details in the films list. Take a look at List of Pixar films in comparison it’s much easier on the eye. Things like budget and RT/Met scores would look much better in a separate “reception” section like in the pixar Article. Lukejordan02 (talk) 00:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already made it for an award from Skydance’s Blush. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 16:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Task force[edit]

To @ZX2006XZ, @Indagate and @LancedSoul, I'm opening up a task force for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Skydance Media work group, focusing on this article, it's projects, and all Skydance Media related articles. If you guys wanna join, that's fine with me. I'm new to this and i need some help on how to run is nice and neat. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]