Talk:Sisupalgarh

Archaeology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Odisha Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha (assessed as High-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Orissa Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 02:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your text[edit]

The comments of Karuna Sagar Behera are trivial in comparison with the wholesale emasculation of this protected monument. Pyule

The chronology of the settlement contradicts that published in M. Smith SAA 2003 p. 297. Pyule 6.11.2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.132.116.212 (talk) 09:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The section on habitation is incomprehensible. Pyule 28.06.2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.132.117.223 (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]